BLACK HOLES IN THE VEDAS.
-Shri Basudeba Mishra
Our ancients knew about black holes (शिलोच्चय) and some have entered inside it. They described them as follows:
There is much more about black holes than people imagine or scientists postulate. If stars and galaxies are like protons, black holes are like neutrons with heliospheres as the electrons. Just like electrons have energy levels, black holes are said to have event horizons. But this is a wrong description.
Event horizon (दृश्यमण्डल) is not related to time cone, which is imaginary and the modern method of drawing them is neither real nor scientific. Why take only two space and one time dimension in the first place? Even then, it will be an expanding circle with time – not a conic section, which is three dimensional. If you introduce the third space dimension, it will be an expanding sphere – not a cone.
Event horizon has to be from the perspective of the Observer (द्रष्टा) and the observed (दृश्य). As the object moves away the energy spreads in space (यत् +जृ – अयं वाव यजुर्योऽयं पवते । एष हि यन्नेवेदं सर्वं जनयति। एतं यन्तमिदमनु प्रजायते। तस्माद्वायुरेव यजुः । अयमेवाको जूः । एतं ह्याकाशमनु जवते । तदेतत् यजुर्वायुश्च अन्तरिक्षञ्च यच्च जूश्च । तस्मात् यजुः। एष एव यत् । एष हि एति । तदेतत् यजुः ऋक्सामयोः प्रतिष्ठितम् । ऋक्सामे वहतः। शतपथब्राह्मणम् – 10-6-3।). If we imagine the initial position of the observed as the diameter of a triangle, the base remains with the observer, but the tip of the triangle (समद्विभुज त्रिकोण), where the object is, moves. Since the area of the triangle remains same, with increasing distance, the base shrinks and we see the object shrinking, till it becomes a point and then vanishes. This is the event horizon from the perspective of the observer (ऋक्).
The event horizon from the perspective of the object being observed, behaves differently. It radiates out in all directions forming a sphere (मण्डल). With increasing distance, the sphere goes on increasing. We see only the radiation coming in our direction from an angular segment, which spreads out – hence thins – with distance. After a distance, it thins out to become invisible. Hence, it vanishes from our sight. This is the event horizon from the perspective of the observed (साम).
Since black holes are sighted indirectly through the so-called “event horizon”, it must be a wrong description. What we see is a body, whose radiation doesn’t come out. This is because, we see objects when electrons (सोम) face away from us – face the protons to make it a discrete particle. Though the positive charge of the proton is much higher and the negative charge is much smaller, only a small fraction of the positive charge radiates out (अग्निम् – अग्निर्जागार तमृचः कामयन्तेऽग्निर्जागार तमु सामानि यन्ति । अग्निर्जागार तमयं सोम आह तवाहमस्मि सख्ये न्योकाः॥ ऋग्वेदः 5-44-15). This is stopped by the negative field surrounding it. The point where the radiation is stopped is called electron.
Inside all matter, the atoms have intra-nucleic space filled with radiation. This keep coming out and is resisted by the negatively charged field. The point where any radiation (that come from protons when these are transformed from neutrons) is confined by the surrounding field, is called electron. Electrons do not have definite orbits nor sharply defined ranges. Their positions are described as probability distributions that taper off gradually, without a sharp edge (atomic orbitals or electron clouds). In condensed matter and molecules, the electron clouds of the atoms usually overlap to some extent, and some of the electrons may roam over a large region encompassing two or more atoms.
Like pulsars, which are rotating neutron stars observed to have pulses of radiation at regular intervals that typically range from milliseconds to seconds and have very strong magnetic fields that funnel jets of particles out along the two magnetic poles, the neutrons accelerate particles to produce powerful beams of light along two axes to form asymmetric orbitals (a maximum of two electrons, each with its own spin quantum numbers, will occupy each of those orbitals). Only hydrogen, with no neutrons, has perfectly symmetric orbitals. Hence the K shell, which consist of s-orbital, can accommodate only 2 electrons.
Shells have stationary energy levels. The energy of each shell is constant. Each stationary orbit or shell is associated with a definite amount of energy. Like the DNA contains 23 pairs of chromosomes, out of which 22 are xx and the 23rd is xy, which determine female and male sex, following the fourfold mechanism (चतुष्टयं वा इदं सर्वम् – शाङ्खानब्राह्मणम्), protons in atoms, which have male or positive charge, have four shells KLMN, which determine the number of electrons as 1, 3, 5, 7 pairs (2, 6, 10, 14 sub-shells or 2, 2+6 = 8, 2+6+10 = 18 and 2+6+10+14 = 32 in number) of electrons in successive subshells. Thus, the L shell can accommodate 8 electrons containing sp orbitals. M shell can accommodate 18 electrons containing spd orbital, and N shell can accommodate 32 electrons containing spdf orbital.
Contrary to popular belief, the amount of positive charge of a proton is less than the negative charge of electrons. Only that way, a hydrogen atom could be stable (negative charge – स्त्रीलिङ्ग – confines positive charge – पुंलिङ्ग – to create atoms like a woman conceives to deliver. The negative charge is spread everywhere. Positive charge is contained in it – स्त्रियः सतीस्ताँ उ मे पुंस आहुः पश्यदक्षण्वान्न वि चेतदन्धः – अस्यवामीयसूक्त – ऋग्वेदः). Also, neutron (नपुंसक लिङ्ग) contains an element of negative charge, which is equal to the difference between that of electron and proton. You can privately ask anyone measuring it, because it is usually not disclosed. Also see Experimental Limits for the Electron-Proton Charge Difference and for the Charge of the Neutron, by Jens Zorn, 1963, Physical Review. It is an experimentally verified fact that neutrons contain an element of negative charge, otherwise how can they have a higher mass than protons?
One counter argument given here is that the excess negative charge would make everything highly charged. The answer is yes. But we do not find this charge. The answer is yes, because the nature of negative charge is flowing from surface inwards and we touch the surface – the opposite direction. Hence, we do not experience any negative charge. This arrangement can be explained by the charge of quarks. The measured value contains 3% error. Instead if -1/3 and +2/3, it should be -4/11 and +7/11. That will make proton charge +10/11 and neutron charge -1/11. That way, the oppositely charged protons and neutrons and co-exist and the higher negative charge of electrons could bind both.
In beta minus decay, a neutron decays into a proton, an electron, and an antineutrino. In beta plus decay, a proton decays into a neutron, a positron, and a neutrino. Thus, the proton draws an electron to inside neutron. The electrons are confined inside it with the protons (how and why, I will write separately). There is a similar arrangement in black holes. This reverse arrangement makes the center of black holes anti-matter – not the modern definition of anti-matter. Like neutrons inside an atom, black holes are found in clusters. You can enter the black holes in a roundabout way, but can’t come out straight. You can do so only with a wormhole, which is connected to its center.
The interiors of stars and galaxies are hot, but that of black holes are cold, because the magnetic fields of black holes are very strong and heat destroys magnetism – hence, it can’t be hot. Since magnetic effect dominates in black holes which turn in loops, you cannot enter a black hole strait, but only in a torturous and spiraling path. The stars and galaxies are made out of plasma. Black hole interiors are made out of anti-matter. If they interact with normal matter, they will explode. When we split an atom, they come out and interact with normal matter, by releasing too much energy. They do not release gamma rays, which are released from nucleus. They release x-rays, which are released from electron shells.
Some say: inside a black hole, matter is densely packed. Hence normal nuclei without the space in between is not found there. That makes stuff denser. But is the answer logical? What is the mechanism? What is this intra-nucleic space? What an electron is? The radius of an atom grows in proportion to its atomic number. The radius of each subsequent nearby atom rises as we proceed down a given column on the periodic table and the number of full electron shells increases, resulting in a larger size. Atomic radius reduces as one progresses through a period and increases as one progresses through a group. The number of energy levels (n) grows as one moves down a group, resulting in a greater distance between the nucleus and the outermost orbital. As a result, the atomic radius increases. Neutrons change the atomic mass. When neutrons are added to the nucleus, the nuclear radius also changes.
Just like neutrons are present inside an atom, the black hole is not a single entity, but a group of macro neutrons. Hence, as more material are added to the black holes, the negative charge inside it compresses the material in a twisted path till the electrons at its center turn into “anti-stars”. I will write about the mechanism from Vedic perspective later.
