TYPES OF ENTANGLEMENT (आरादुपकारक & संनिपत्योपकारक) – 8 – Shri Basudeba Mishra
MODERN SCIENTIFIC EDUCATION NEEDS CHANGE.
Modern scientific education discourages application of mind (inquisitiveness) and encourages superstition. All scientific papers or text books are replete with unwanted superlative terms for past scientists and their “established theories”, even after latest research raised questions on their validity. Mostly, it is guided by fiction, calling it imagination. The students are over-burdened with unwanted extra material in the guise of history of science, to lead them through a blind alley. Whenever they have doubts, they are told that now you will not understand it. But rest assured, it has been proved and you will read about them in higher classes. By the time they pass out, they have become robots – blindly following what they have been taught – and not looking beyond that. One example is extra-dimensions, which idea came from a fiction, but has never been found out even after more than a century.
One satirical and religious allegory named Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions; was written by Edwin Abbott in 1884, demonstrating the absurdity of those unwilling to admit their own ignorance, even when they scoff at the ignorance of others. Narrated by a Square, Flatland is the fantasy about life in a two-dimensional world, where all existence is limited to length and breadth and its inhabitants unable even to imagine a third dimension – height. Everything becomes topsy-turvy when a three-dimensional sphere enters their world.
As usual, Einstein didn’t define a dimension precisely, but described time as the fourth dimension, taking it as another aspect of objects. This is wrong, because the three dimensions are inseparable, like the electric field, the magnetic field and their direction of motion are inseparable. If any of the factors are missing, it becomes meaningless. It has been shown earlier that time is not a dimension. Since both space and time are infinite and coexist, there was not much problem when Einstein used the term four dimensional space-time continuum. However, questions were being raised about Relativity.
The mass-energy equivalence equation E = mc^2 was developed by Poincare in 1900 AD, 5 years before Einstein. The solution relating to the perihelion of Mercury, was settled by Gerber without using GR. Einstein had stolen his ideas, which was challenged by Gerber and Einstein had to flee. He was desperately looking for some way out. Then, based on the fiction Flatlands, Kaluza and Klein came up with the idea that while the fields of the Standard Model are confined to a four-dimensional membrane, gravity propagates in several additional spatial dimensions that are large compared to the Planck scale. Einstein grabbed the idea and since then all scientists to date are chasing this fantasy with additional imagination.
Some talk about Many-Worlds Quantum Theory with 26 dimensions, which are the degrees of freedom. Others talk about 11 dimensions, because conditions become unstable and particles naturally collapse back down into 10 or 11 dimensions. The 12th dimension, for example, introduces a second time. While strings can only vibrate in 10 dimensions, membranes can exist at 11 dimensions. A 12-Dimensional Space is a space in which each point requires a duodecuplet of numbers to describe its position. This makes it a hyper-realm. Some talk about 64 Dimension, which comes from 8 other dimension: Time, Graviton, Energy, Speed, Field, Temperature, Mass, Density. A 100 dimensional simplex (triangle) has 101 pointy corners and 101 faces (as a 99D simplex), becoming more like a cube. The angle between edges starts off at 60 degrees in 2D, but gets closer to 90 degrees in very high-D. The volume is more evened out than the 100-cube, but still concentrated in the corners. These are colossal waste of time, effort and public money. But by this, scientists enjoy at public expenses.
There is a saying, if you want to impress a fool, twist the facts out of context so much that he will not understand anything and accept you a great personality (मूर्खं छन्दोनुवृत्तेन), which makes others dwarfs in his presence. But when you find a wise man, impress him by being truthful (सत्येन पण्डितः). Modern scientists use such garbage to impress the general public by fooling them. But the fact that no one comes up with the truth – like telling the King is naked – shows that there is no wise men among modern scientists.
Another example of fictionalization is time travel. General relativity predicts the existence of time loops or time travel – where an event can be both in the past and future of itself. This turns the study of dynamics on its head – like in the grandfather paradox. A man goes into past to kill his grandfather, so that his father would not be born. In that case, wherefrom he came? Such fictionalization is possible and thousands of “peer reviewed” research papers are published because no one looks at the root: What is the nature of time?
Space has two segments: in between objects (अन्तरिक्षम् – अन्तरा क्षान्तं भवति) and the universal field where we observe everything (आकाशम्). It is all pervasive. But time is cyclic – with different frequencies (कालास्सम्वत्सरग्गं श्रिताः) and flows like a river (नदीव प्रभवात्काचित्) never to return (सोरुस्सती न निवर्तते) repeating the cycles (एवन्नानासमुत्थानाः). Objects evolve in time in six steps (षडध्वाकालः) uniformly for everything in the universe. These are: 1) from being as cause (जायते), to 2) becoming as effect (अस्ति), to 3) growth due to accumulation of similar others (बर्द्धते), to 4) transformation due to accumulation of harmonious others (विपरिणमते), to 5) transmutation due to the opposite effect (अपक्षीयते), to final disintegration and dissolution in the cause to reappear in a different combination (विनश्यति). Though parts of the constituent atoms reappear in a different combination, the “same” combination is never repeated. An old person never goes back to youth or infancy, but might be born as a new child elsewhere. We do not know.
Everyday experience says a field is static and forces move objects in the field in time. Einstein turned this concept on its head to impute curvature as a property of spacetime in the presence of mass. It is as if the players in a football are standing still. Their presence makes the field take the ball to different places, which appears to us as the football game. The field also makes the players to appear as playing. Mind you, the field acts only with the ball – nothing else – even if another ball is placed in the corner, the field will not touch it. If you enter the field, it will not touch you. The branch below the apple will not be affected by the curvature. Only the apple will appear to fall, though actually, it is stationary.
A fundamental mathematical principle is that you can do mathematics only with similar objects (सामान्यमेकत्वकरं विशेषस्तु पृथक्त्वकृत् । तुल्यार्थता हि सामान्यं विशेषस्तु विपर्ययः). You can add apples only with apples (सर्वदा सर्वभावानां सामान्यं बृद्धिकारणम्). You can add apples and oranges only as fruits. But if the total can be differentiated, they can be reduced (ह्रासहेतु विशेषश्च प्रवृत्तिरुभयस्य तु). You can separate apples and oranges.
All objects are discreet (मूर्त्तः), because they are related to only a few other objects (मूर्तिरसर्वगतद्रव्यपरिमाणम्). All actions take place with objects (तदनुविधायिनी च क्रिया), because action involves displacement from its position and moving to a position not occupied by it earlier (सा चाकाशादिषु नास्ति). Same is with events. Both space and time are related equally to all objects and events (अमूर्त्तः) in the same way. Hence they belong to different classes and no mathematics is possible with objects and space-time (तस्मान्न तेषां क्रियासम्बन्धोऽस्तीति). The position of objects is not “space”, but “in space”. Similarly, all events are not time, but they happen “in time”. Both space and time are infinite. Infinities are like one – without similars – with a difference. Whereas the dimensions of one are fully discernible (परिच्छिन्न), the dimensions of infinity are not discernible (अपरिच्छिन्न). We perceive discreet objects due to continued similar perception about itself (अनुवृत्तिप्रत्ययः) and difference from others (व्यावृत्तिप्रत्ययः). There is no difference in perception of different objects other than this (परमार्थे तु नैकत्वं पृथक्त्वाद्भिन्नलक्षणम्). Where similarity is beyond doubt, there can be no difference (यत् पृथक्त्वमसन्दिग्धं तदेकत्वान्नभिद्यते). Similarly, where difference is beyond doubt, similarity can’t exist (यदेकत्वमसन्दिग्धं तत्पृथक्त्वान्न भिद्यते). In the case of infinity, we can’t find similar others. Hence no mathematics is possible with infinity. But they coexist being Rhtam (bosons). Hence, we use the term space-time (देशकाल).
(to be continued)